top of page
When school boards across the country became battlegrounds for partisan politics, a hotbed of division emerged. New partisan leaders began to limit student opportunity, decrease teacher effectiveness, and undermine parental decision-making:
Teacher & Staff Relations: Rejected funding for professional development, targeted individual teachers through policy and discipline, undermined staff expertise, and poorly handled the superintendent search.
Policy & Transparency: Pushed controversial policies, like removing a resolution against racism and discrimination from building walls and proposing bathroom policies aimed at the mythical use of kitty litter, and changing rules around sharing campaign literature on campus to increase their chances of reelection.
Curriculum & Instruction: Rejected recommended learning software (iReady), attempted elimination of Black history/literature electives, attacked books with LGBTQ+ themes or violence, and restricted the use of pronouns and/or mentions of gender identity.
These actions caused dsitricts to frequent local headlines, gain national media coverage, and struggle to retain quality teachers.
These actions underscore why the role of school board director is one of the few offices where candidates should not declare a party affiliation and why boards should function independently from any political party or national interest group. The local needs of students, teachers, and families should be the board’s central focus.
Furthermore, this practice should be a statewide aapproach. The legislature should never single out a single county or municipality for partisan gain.
bottom of page